FabDigitFabDigit

Tungsten Alloy EWZr-1 vs W (99.95% CP Tungsten)

Tungsten Alloy · grade comparison

Tungsten Alloy EWZr-1 and W (99.95% CP Tungsten) are both tungsten alloy grades. EWZr-1 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 750 MPa (109 ksi) for W (99.95% CP Tungsten), about 20% more; tensile strength follows at 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 950 MPa (138 ksi). EWZr-1 is harder — 44 HRC against 39 HRC for W (99.95% CP Tungsten) — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. EWZr-1 runs hotter in service (2,500°C vs 1,200°C continuous).

EWZr-1Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

EWZr-1 vs W (99.95% CP Tungsten): properties

EWZr-1W (99.95% CP Tungsten)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
156 GPa22.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,250 MPa181 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

900 MPa131 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Compressive Strength

1,800 MPa261 ksi
1,400 MPa203 ksi

Shear Strength

700 MPa102 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

10 MPa·√m9.1 ksi·√in
12 MPa·√m10.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

2 J1.5 ft·lbf
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

44 HRC
39 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

450 HV
440 HV

Reduction in Area

—
3%

Hardness, Brinell

—
415 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 400 GPa58 Msi · Bulk Modulus 310 GPa45 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.28 · Elongation at Break 2%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

19.2 g/cm³0.69 lb/in³
19.25 g/cm³0.7 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

3,410°C6,170 °F
3,422°C6,192 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 3,422°C6,192 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

165 W/m·K95.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
173 W/m·K100 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

134 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F
132 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

2,500°C4,532 °F
1,200°C2,192 °F

Min Service Temperature

—
20°C68 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 192 J/g82.5 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

29 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.9×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.32 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
62 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.15 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

8 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

5%
12%

Weldability

10 / 100
12 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
8 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
3 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

28 kg CO₂/kg
27 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 400 MJ/kg171,969 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

65 kN·m/kg
49 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,013 kJ/m³
703 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

64.1 mm²/s
68.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

115
91

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 20.8 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every tungsten alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

5007001,0001,500141516171819Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleW (99.95% CP Tungsten)EWZr-1

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEWZr-1W (99.95% CP Tungsten)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

EWZr-1 vs W (99.95% CP Tungsten) — frequently asked

Is EWZr-1 stronger than W (99.95% CP Tungsten)?

Yes. EWZr-1 has a typical yield strength of 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 750 MPa (109 ksi) for W (99.95% CP Tungsten) — about 20% more. Tensile strength is 1,250 MPa (181 ksi) vs 950 MPa (138 ksi).

Which is cheaper, EWZr-1 or W (99.95% CP Tungsten)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose EWZr-1 over W (99.95% CP Tungsten)?

Pick EWZr-1 when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EWZr-1 and W (99.95% CP Tungsten) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.