Tungsten Alloy 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe vs W (99.95% CP Tungsten)
Tungsten Alloy · grade comparison
Tungsten Alloy 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe and W (99.95% CP Tungsten) are both tungsten alloy grades. W (99.95% CP Tungsten) is the stronger of the two: yield strength 750 MPa (109 ksi) against 600 MPa (87 ksi) for 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe is the more ductile: elongation 4% versus 2% for W (99.95% CP Tungsten), and W (99.95% CP Tungsten) is harder (415 HB vs 290 HB). 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe is lighter (18.5 g/cm³ vs 19.25 g/cm³ for W (99.95% CP Tungsten)) and W (99.95% CP Tungsten) runs hotter in service (1,200°C vs 500°C continuous). On the shop floor, 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe machines more easily (fair vs not recommended).
97W-2.1Ni-0.9FeChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.
W (99.95% CP Tungsten)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.
97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe vs W (99.95% CP Tungsten): propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all tungsten alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all tungsten alloy grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
97W-2.1Ni-0.9FeW (99.95% CP Tungsten)
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell C
Hardness, Vickers
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Density
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Min Service Temperature
Latent Heat of Fusion
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Corrosion Resistance
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Castability
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every tungsten alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe | W (99.95% CP Tungsten) |
|---|---|---|
| Default condition | — | — |
| Relative cost | $$$$ High | $$$$ High |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe vs W (99.95% CP Tungsten) — frequently asked
Is W (99.95% CP Tungsten) stronger than 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe?
Yes. W (99.95% CP Tungsten) has a typical yield strength of 750 MPa (109 ksi) against 600 MPa (87 ksi) for 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 950 MPa (138 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).
Which is cheaper, 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe or W (99.95% CP Tungsten)?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe or W (99.95% CP Tungsten)?
97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against not recommended (12/100) for W (99.95% CP Tungsten).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 97W-2.1Ni-0.9Fe and W (99.95% CP Tungsten) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.