FabDigitFabDigit

Tungsten Alloy EWLa-1 vs EWP (WP)

Tungsten Alloy · grade comparison

Tungsten Alloy EWLa-1 and EWP (WP) are both tungsten alloy grades. EWLa-1 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 850 MPa (123 ksi) against 750 MPa (109 ksi) for EWP (WP), about 13% more. EWLa-1 is harder — 455 HB against 420 HB for EWP (WP) — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. EWP (WP) runs hotter in service (450°C vs 400°C continuous).

EWLa-1Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

EWP (WP)Choose it when the part sees heat.

EWLa-1 vs EWP (WP): properties

EWLa-1EWP (WP)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

850 MPa123 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Reduction in Area

1%
2%

Compressive Strength

1,800 MPa261 ksi
1,600 MPa232 ksi

Shear Strength

600 MPa87 ksi
650 MPa94.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

2 J1.5 ft·lbf
1 J0.74 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

455 HB
420 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

47 HRC
45 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

480 HV
450 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 400 GPa58 Msi · Bulk Modulus 310 GPa45 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.28 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 1,100 MPa160 ksi · Elongation at Break 2% · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 10 MPa·√m9.1 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

19.1 g/cm³0.69 lb/in³
19.25 g/cm³0.7 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

3,410°C6,170 °F
3,422°C6,192 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 3,422°C6,192 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

160 W/m·K92.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
170 W/m·K98.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

133 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F
132 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

192 J/g82.5 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
450°C842 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 4.5 µm/m·K2.5 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

29 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.36 µΩ·in
5.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.17 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
65 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.15 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

8 / 100
10 / 100

Weldability

10 / 100
15 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 5% · Formability (cold) 5 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 45 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

24 kg CO₂/kg
25 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 380 MJ/kg163,371 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

58 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

20.9 MN·m/kg
20.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

903 kJ/m³
703 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

63 mm²/s
66.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

98
104

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every tungsten alloy grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

5007001,0001,500141516171819Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEWP (WP)EWLa-1

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEWLa-1EWP (WP)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

EWLa-1 vs EWP (WP) — frequently asked

Is EWLa-1 stronger than EWP (WP)?

Yes. EWLa-1 has a typical yield strength of 850 MPa (123 ksi) against 750 MPa (109 ksi) for EWP (WP) — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 1,100 MPa (160 ksi).

Which is cheaper, EWLa-1 or EWP (WP)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, EWLa-1 or EWP (WP)?

EWP (WP). Its weldability rates poor (15/100) against not recommended (10/100) for EWLa-1.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EWLa-1 and EWP (WP) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.