FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium IMI 550 vs Ti-17

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium IMI 550 and Ti-17 are both titanium grades. Both yield at about 1,050 MPa — strength does not separate them. IMI 550 is the more ductile: elongation 13% versus 10% for Ti-17. IMI 550 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous).

IMI 550Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

IMI 550 vs Ti-17: properties

IMI 550Ti-17

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

115 GPa16.7 Msi
112 GPa16.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
42.5 GPa6.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

107 GPa15.5 Msi
104 GPa15.1 Msi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,050 MPa152 ksi
1,075 MPa156 ksi

Elongation at Break

13%
10%

Reduction in Area

30%
25%

Compressive Strength

1,120 MPa162 ksi
1,150 MPa167 ksi

Shear Strength

690 MPa100 ksi
700 MPa102 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

580 MPa84.1 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

45 MPa·√m41 ksi·√in
55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

15 J11.1 ft·lbf
17 J12.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

333 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

36 HRC
37 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

350 HV
365 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.32 · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 1,150 MPa167 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.6 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³
4.65 g/cm³0.17 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,590°C2,894 °F
1,600°C2,912 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,650°C3,002 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

7.1 W/m·K4.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
7 W/m·K4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

565 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

365 J/g157 BTU/lb
325 J/g140 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 9.4 µm/m·K5.2 µin/in·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.1 % IACS
—

Electrical Resistivity

1.65×10⁻⁶ Ω·m65 µΩ·in
1.7×10⁻⁶ Ω·m66.9 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V · Corrosion Resistance 85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

18%
15%

Weldability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

20 / 100
—

Same in both: Machinability 16 / 100 · Formability (cold) 15 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 35 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb
680 MJ/kg292,348 BTU/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 42 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

250 kN·m/kg
247 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25 MN·m/kg
24.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

4,793 kJ/m³
5,159 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.7 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTi-17IMI 550

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityIMI 550Ti-17
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

IMI 550 vs Ti-17 — frequently asked

What is the difference between IMI 550 and Ti-17?

Titanium IMI 550 and Ti-17 are both titanium grades. Both yield at about 1,050 MPa — strength does not separate them. IMI 550 is the more ductile: elongation 13% versus 10% for Ti-17.

Which is cheaper, IMI 550 or Ti-17?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, IMI 550 or Ti-17?

Ti-17. Its weldability rates poor (30/100) against poor (25/100) for IMI 550.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in IMI 550 and Ti-17 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.