FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium B817 Type II vs CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder)

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium B817 Type II and CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder) are both titanium grades. B817 Type II is the stronger of the two: yield strength 855 MPa (124 ksi) against 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) for CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder), about 61% more; tensile strength follows at 930 MPa (135 ksi) vs 640 MPa (92.8 ksi). In exchange, CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder) is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 12% for B817 Type II, and B817 Type II is harder (330 HB vs 205 HB). B817 Type II is stiffer (113 GPa vs 105 GPa) and B817 Type II runs hotter in service (350°C vs 300°C continuous). On the shop floor, CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder) machines more easily (fair vs poor) and CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder) welds better (excellent vs good).

B817 Type IIChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder)Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

B817 Type II vs CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder): properties

B817 Type IICP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

113 GPa16.4 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

43 GPa6.2 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
110 GPa16 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

930 MPa135 ksi
640 MPa92.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

855 MPa124 ksi
530 MPa76.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
18%

Reduction in Area

20%
35%

Compressive Strength

970 MPa141 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Shear Strength

550 MPa79.8 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
65 MPa·√m59.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

18 J13.3 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

330 HB
205 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

35 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

345 HV
220 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
95 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.34

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.42 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,604°C2,919 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,660°C3,020 °F
1,670°C3,038 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

6.7 W/m·K3.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.4 W/m·K9.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

560 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F
523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

8.7 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F
8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
365 J/g157 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-250°C-418 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1 % IACS
3.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.71×10⁻⁶ Ω·m67.3 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

22%
35%

Weldability

60 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

680 MJ/kg292,348 BTU/lb
900 MJ/kg386,931 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

42 kg CO₂/kg
52 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
800 L/kg95.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

210 kN·m/kg
142 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
23.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

3,235 kJ/m³
1,338 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.7 mm²/s
7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleB817 Type IICP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityB817 Type IICP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

B817 Type II vs CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder) — frequently asked

Is B817 Type II stronger than CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder)?

Yes. B817 Type II has a typical yield strength of 855 MPa (124 ksi) against 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) for CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder) — about 61% more. Tensile strength is 930 MPa (135 ksi) vs 640 MPa (92.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, B817 Type II or CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, B817 Type II or CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder)?

CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder). Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (20/100) for B817 Type II; for welding the order is CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder) first (excellent, 88/100) then B817 Type II (good, 60/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in B817 Type II and CP-Ti Grade 2 (AM Powder) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.