FabDigitFabDigit

Steel SPHC vs SS400

Steel · grade comparison

Steel SPHC and SS400 are both steel grades, both structural steel. SS400 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for SPHC, about 17% more; tensile strength follows at 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi). In exchange, SPHC is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 26% for SS400, and SS400 is harder (125 HB vs 110 HB). SPHC runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous).

SPHCChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

SS400Choose it when strength drives the design.

SPHC vs SS400: properties

SPHCSS400

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

310 MPa45 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

38%
26%

Reduction in Area

60%
55%

Shear Strength

210 MPa30.5 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

155 MPa22.5 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in
80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
40 J29.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

110 HB
125 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

64 HRB
70 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

115 HV
130 HV

Compressive Strength

—
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,530°C2,786 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

52 W/m·K30 BTU/hr·ft·°F
51 W/m·K29.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 247 J/g106 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10.5 % IACS
10.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.65×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.5 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.62 V
-0.65 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

68 / 100
65 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

68%
70%

Weldability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
78 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

—
40 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb
25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

39 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

140 kJ/m³
191 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
9

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 13.8 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSPHCSS400

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySPHCSS400
CNC machining—Yes
Default conditionHRHR
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
TiAlN—Yes
TiB2—Yes
TiCN—Yes
TiN—Yes
WC/C—Yes
ZrN—Yes

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 22 finishes: Black Oxide, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Hot-Dip Galvanizing, Manganese Phosphate, Nickel Plating and 10 more.

SPHC vs SS400 — frequently asked

Is SS400 stronger than SPHC?

Yes. SS400 has a typical yield strength of 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for SPHC — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) vs 310 MPa (45 ksi).

Which is cheaper, SPHC or SS400?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose SPHC over SS400?

Pick SPHC when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat. Pick SS400 when strength drives the design.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in SPHC and SS400 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.