FabDigitFabDigit

Steel GX3Ni36 vs K93500

Steel · grade comparison

Steel GX3Ni36 and K93500 are both steel grades. K93500 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for GX3Ni36, about 17% more; tensile strength follows at 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi). K93500 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 25% for GX3Ni36, and K93500 is harder (140 HB vs 130 HB). On the shop floor, K93500 welds better (very good vs good).

K93500Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

GX3Ni36 vs K93500: properties

GX3Ni36K93500

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
141 GPa20.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

55 GPa8 Msi
57 GPa8.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

105 GPa15.2 Msi
100 GPa14.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
490 MPa71.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
40%

Reduction in Area

33%
68%

Compressive Strength

245 MPa35.5 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Shear Strength

320 MPa46.4 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

195 MPa28.3 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
180 J133 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

130 HB
140 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

73 HRB
78 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

137 HV
147 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.1 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8.05 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,427°C2,601 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

11 W/m·K6.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
10.5 W/m·K6.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

2.2 µm/m·K1.2 µin/in·°F
1.3 µm/m·K0.72 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 515 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 275 J/g118 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.1 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 8.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m32.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.35 V
-0.45 V

Corrosion Resistance

25 / 100
22 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
30%

Weldability

58 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

56 kN·m/kg
61 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17.3 MN·m/kg
17.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

206 kJ/m³
278 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.6 mm²/s
2.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
28

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGX3Ni36K93500

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityGX3Ni36K93500
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

GX3Ni36 vs K93500 — frequently asked

Is K93500 stronger than GX3Ni36?

Yes. K93500 has a typical yield strength of 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for GX3Ni36 — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, GX3Ni36 or K93500?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, GX3Ni36 or K93500?

K93500. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against good (58/100) for GX3Ni36.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in GX3Ni36 and K93500 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.