FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 4J36 vs GX3Ni36

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 4J36 and GX3Ni36 are both steel grades. 4J36 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for GX3Ni36, about 17% more; tensile strength follows at 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi). 4J36 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 25% for GX3Ni36, and 4J36 is harder (145 HV vs 137 HV). On the shop floor, 4J36 welds better (very good vs good).

4J36Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

4J36 vs GX3Ni36: properties

4J36GX3Ni36

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

141 GPa20.5 Msi
140 GPa20.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

110 GPa16 Msi
105 GPa15.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

490 MPa71.1 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
25%

Reduction in Area

65%
33%

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
195 MPa28.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

160 J118 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

135 HB
130 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

76 HRB
73 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

145 HV
137 HV

Compressive Strength

—
245 MPa35.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Same in both: Shear Modulus 55 GPa8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,427°C2,601 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Same in both: Density 8.1 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

10.5 W/m·K6.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11 W/m·K6.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

1.5 µm/m·K0.83 µin/in·°F
2.2 µm/m·K1.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
275 J/g118 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 515 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.2 % IACS
2.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in
8.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m32.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.4 V
-0.35 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
25%

Weldability

75 / 100
58 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 30 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
56 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

17.4 MN·m/kg
17.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

278 kJ/m³
206 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

2.5 mm²/s
2.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
16

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleGX3Ni364J36

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability4J36GX3Ni36
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

4J36 vs GX3Ni36 — frequently asked

Is 4J36 stronger than GX3Ni36?

Yes. 4J36 has a typical yield strength of 280 MPa (40.6 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for GX3Ni36 — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) vs 450 MPa (65.3 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 4J36 or GX3Ni36?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 4J36 or GX3Ni36?

4J36. Its weldability rates very good (75/100) against good (58/100) for GX3Ni36.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 4J36 and GX3Ni36 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.