FabDigitFabDigit

Steel FeSi75 vs Ingot Iron

Steel · grade comparison

Steel FeSi75 and Ingot Iron are both steel grades. Ingot Iron is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for FeSi75, about 129% more. Ingot Iron is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 0% for FeSi75, and FeSi75 is harder (900 HV vs 75 HV). FeSi75 is lighter (3 g/cm³ vs 7.87 g/cm³ for Ingot Iron) and Ingot Iron is stiffer (205 GPa vs 160 GPa). On the shop floor, Ingot Iron machines more easily (fair vs not recommended), Ingot Iron welds better (excellent vs not recommended), and FeSi75 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Ingot Iron (standard, $$).

FeSi75Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

Ingot IronChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

FeSi75 vs Ingot Iron: properties

FeSi75Ingot Iron

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

120 MPa17.4 ksi
275 MPa39.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

0%
45%

Reduction in Area

0%
70%

Compressive Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Shear Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2 MPa·√m1.8 ksi·√in
130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

1 J0.74 ft·lbf
200 J148 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

67 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

900 HV
75 HV

Shear Modulus

—
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
170 GPa24.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

—
0.29

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

—
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

—
70 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
28 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

3 g/cm³0.11 lb/in³
7.87 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,210°C2,210 °F
1,535°C2,795 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,330°C2,426 °F
1,538°C2,800 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

12 W/m·K6.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
78 W/m·K45.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

700 J/kg·K0.17 BTU/lb·°F
455 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

1,150 J/g494 BTU/lb
247 J/g106 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

800°C1,472 °F
450°C842 °F

Min Service Temperature

—
-50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

0.29 % IACS
17.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6×10⁻⁶ Ω·m236 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m3.94 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
10 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.62 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

3 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

3%
50%

Weldability

3 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

1 / 100
95 / 100

Castability

—
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

—
85 / 100

Polishability

—
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb
28 MJ/kg12,038 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

2%
15%

Embodied Water

—
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

40 kN·m/kg
35 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

53.3 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

5.7 mm²/s
21.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

1
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleIngot Iron

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityFeSi75Ingot Iron
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

FeSi75 vs Ingot Iron — frequently asked

Is Ingot Iron stronger than FeSi75?

Yes. Ingot Iron has a typical tensile strength of 275 MPa (39.9 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for FeSi75 — about 129% more.

Which is cheaper, FeSi75 or Ingot Iron?

FeSi75 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Ingot Iron is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, FeSi75 or Ingot Iron?

Ingot Iron. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against not recommended (3/100) for FeSi75; for welding the order is Ingot Iron first (excellent, 95/100) then FeSi75 (not recommended, 3/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in FeSi75 and Ingot Iron side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.