FabDigitFabDigit

Steel En47-CD vs En47 QT28-32

Steel · En47 temper comparison

En47-CD and En47 QT28-32 are two conditions of the same steel grade, En47: CD (cold drawn) versus QT28-32 (Q&T 28–32 HRC). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. En47 QT28-32 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 880 MPa (128 ksi) against 700 MPa (102 ksi) for En47-CD, about 26% more; tensile strength follows at 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 860 MPa (125 ksi). En47 QT28-32 is the more ductile: elongation 15% versus 10% for En47-CD, and En47 QT28-32 is harder (300 HB vs 250 HB). En47 QT28-32 runs hotter in service (450°C vs 250°C continuous). On the shop floor, En47-CD machines more easily (good vs fair).

En47-CDChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

En47 QT28-32Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

En47-CD vs En47 QT28-32: properties

En47-CDEn47 QT28-32

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

860 MPa125 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

700 MPa102 ksi
880 MPa128 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
15%

Reduction in Area

40%
52%

Compressive Strength

720 MPa104 ksi
1,500 MPa218 ksi

Shear Strength

520 MPa75.4 ksi
960 MPa139 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

390 MPa56.6 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
45 J33.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

250 HB
300 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

24 HRC
30 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

262 HV
315 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 207 GPa30 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,480°C2,696 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
43 W/m·K24.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
450°C842 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 7.8 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.62 V · Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

58%
45%

Weldability

25 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
10 / 100

Same in both: Castability 30 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 35 / 100 · Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 27 MJ/kg11,608 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.3 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleEn47

En47-CD vs En47 QT28-32 — frequently asked

Is En47 QT28-32 stronger than En47-CD?

Yes. En47 QT28-32 has a typical yield strength of 880 MPa (128 ksi) against 700 MPa (102 ksi) for En47-CD — about 26% more. Tensile strength is 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 860 MPa (125 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, CD or QT28-32?

QT44-48 is the default En47 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither CD nor QT28-32). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, En47-CD or En47 QT28-32?

En47-CD. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (45/100) for En47 QT28-32; for welding the order is En47-CD first (poor, 25/100) then En47 QT28-32 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in En47-CD and En47 QT28-32 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.