FabDigitFabDigit

Steel EM12K vs ER70S-2

Steel · grade comparison

Steel EM12K and ER70S-2 are both steel grades. Both yield at about 450 MPa — strength does not separate them. EM12K is harder — 165 HB against 155 HB for ER70S-2 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, EM12K forms better (80 vs 70 out of 100) and EM12K sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than ER70S-2 (standard, $$).

EM12KChoose it when surface hardness matters, or when cost is the deciding factor.

EM12K vs ER70S-2: properties

EM12KER70S-2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Reduction in Area

65%
68%

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
115 MPa·√m105 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

100 J73.8 ft·lbf
120 J88.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

165 HB
155 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
82 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

175 HV
163 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 205 GPa29.7 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 450 MPa65.3 ksi · Elongation at Break 28% · Compressive Strength 450 MPa65.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,470°C2,678 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,520°C2,768 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

50 W/m·K28.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F
12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F · Min Service Temperature -30°C-22 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10 % IACS
10.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.62 V
-0.61 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
62 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
98 / 100

Formability (cold)

80 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

75 / 100
65 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 65%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
35 L/kg4.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

70 kN·m/kg
71 kN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

13.6 mm²/s
13 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

11
10

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.1 MN·m/kg · Modulus of Resilience 494 kJ/m³

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER70S-2EM12K

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEM12KER70S-2
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

EM12K vs ER70S-2 — frequently asked

What is the difference between EM12K and ER70S-2?

Steel EM12K and ER70S-2 are both steel grades. Both yield at about 450 MPa — strength does not separate them. EM12K is harder — 165 HB against 155 HB for ER70S-2 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

Which is cheaper, EM12K or ER70S-2?

EM12K is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while ER70S-2 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose EM12K over ER70S-2?

Pick EM12K when surface hardness matters, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EM12K and ER70S-2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.