FabDigitFabDigit

Steel CPM 3V Annealed vs CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC

Steel · CPM 3V temper comparison

CPM 3V Annealed and CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC are two conditions of the same steel grade, CPM 3V: Annealed versus HT 54-56 HRC (high-toughness temper). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,550 MPa (225 ksi) against 600 MPa (87 ksi) for CPM 3V Annealed, about 158% more; tensile strength follows at 1,800 MPa (261 ksi) vs 900 MPa (131 ksi). In exchange, CPM 3V Annealed is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 4% for CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC, and CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC is harder (560 HB vs 255 HB). CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC runs hotter in service (500°C vs 400°C continuous). On the shop floor, CPM 3V Annealed machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and CPM 3V Annealed welds better (poor vs not recommended).

CPM 3V AnnealedChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

CPM 3V Annealed vs CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC: properties

CPM 3V AnnealedCPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
214 GPa31 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
1,800 MPa261 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

600 MPa87 ksi
1,550 MPa225 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
4%

Reduction in Area

28%
8%

Compressive Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
2,200 MPa319 ksi

Shear Strength

550 MPa79.8 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

55 J40.6 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

255 HB
560 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

25 HRC
55 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

268 HV
595 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 81 GPa11.7 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Hardness, Rockwell B 103 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.46 g/cm³0.27 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

23 W/m·K13.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
500°C932 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in
6.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m24.4 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.9 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

20 / 100
22 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
12 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

25%
10%

Weldability

25 / 100
10 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
4 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 40 / 100 · Polishability 80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 3.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 20%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCPM 3V

CPM 3V Annealed vs CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC — frequently asked

Is CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC stronger than CPM 3V Annealed?

Yes. CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC has a typical yield strength of 1,550 MPa (225 ksi) against 600 MPa (87 ksi) for CPM 3V Annealed — about 158% more. Tensile strength is 1,800 MPa (261 ksi) vs 900 MPa (131 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, Annealed or HT 54-56 HRC?

Annealed is the default CPM 3V condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, CPM 3V Annealed or CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC?

CPM 3V Annealed. Its machinability rates poor (30/100) against not recommended (12/100) for CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC; for welding the order is CPM 3V Annealed first (poor, 25/100) then CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CPM 3V Annealed and CPM 3V HT 54-56 HRC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.