FabDigitFabDigit

Steel CA6NM vs WC1

Steel · grade comparison

Steel CA6NM and WC1 are both steel grades. CA6NM is the stronger of the two: yield strength 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for WC1, about 126% more; tensile strength follows at 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, WC1 is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 20% for CA6NM, and CA6NM is harder (260 HB vs 160 HB). WC1 conducts heat better (42 W/m·K vs 25 W/m·K). On the shop floor, WC1 machines more easily (good vs fair) and WC1 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than CA6NM (premium, $$$).

CA6NMChoose it when strength drives the design.

WC1Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

CA6NM vs WC1: properties

CA6NMWC1

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

830 MPa120 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

690 MPa100 ksi
305 MPa44.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
28%

Reduction in Area

60%
48%

Compressive Strength

690 MPa100 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Shear Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

380 MPa55.1 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in
130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

100 J73.8 ft·lbf
50 J36.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

260 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

25 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

275 HV
168 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
84 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,505°C2,741 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.5 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F
12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

450°C842 °F
455°C851 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-29°C-20 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.3 % IACS
8.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.9 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.32 V
-0.61 V

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
60%

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

75 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb
26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.1 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
80%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

108 kN·m/kg
66 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,190 kJ/m³
227 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

7.1 mm²/s
11.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleWC1CA6NM

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCA6NMWC1
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

CA6NM vs WC1 — frequently asked

Is CA6NM stronger than WC1?

Yes. CA6NM has a typical yield strength of 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for WC1 — about 126% more. Tensile strength is 830 MPa (120 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, CA6NM or WC1?

WC1 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while CA6NM is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, CA6NM or WC1?

WC1. Its machinability rates good (58/100) against fair (40/100) for CA6NM.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CA6NM and WC1 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.