FabDigitFabDigit

Steel Alloy 49 vs FeMn

Steel · grade comparison

Steel Alloy 49 and FeMn are both steel grades. Alloy 49 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for FeMn, about 4.4 times as much. Alloy 49 is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 0% for FeMn, and FeMn is harder (600 HB vs 120 HB). FeMn is lighter (7.1 g/cm³ vs 8.25 g/cm³ for Alloy 49) and FeMn is stiffer (180 GPa vs 150 GPa). On the shop floor, Alloy 49 machines more easily (fair vs not recommended), Alloy 49 welds better (very good vs not recommended), and FeMn sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than Alloy 49 (high, $$$$).

Alloy 49Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

FeMnChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Alloy 49 vs FeMn: properties

Alloy 49FeMn

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

150 GPa21.8 Msi
180 GPa26.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

58 GPa8.4 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

155 GPa22.5 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

530 MPa76.9 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

220 MPa31.9 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

38%
0%

Reduction in Area

65%
—

Shear Strength

350 MPa50.8 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

100 J73.8 ft·lbf
2 J1.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
600 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

70 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

125 HV
650 HV

Compressive Strength

—
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
3 MPa·√m2.7 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
58 HRC

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.25 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³
7.1 g/cm³0.26 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,240°C2,264 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,280°C2,336 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

13.5 W/m·K7.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
9 W/m·K5.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
520 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9.5 µm/m·K5.3 µin/in·°F
17 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

480°C896 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
—

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
1.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
1.2×10⁻⁶ Ω·m47.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.35 V
-0.95 V

Corrosion Resistance

32 / 100
6 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
5 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
5%

Weldability

70 / 100
5 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
2 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
—

Polishability

70 / 100
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

8.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

64 kN·m/kg
17 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

18.2 MN·m/kg
25.4 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

3.3 mm²/s
2.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 49

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityAlloy 49FeMn
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

Alloy 49 vs FeMn — frequently asked

Is Alloy 49 stronger than FeMn?

Yes. Alloy 49 has a typical tensile strength of 530 MPa (76.9 ksi) against 120 MPa (17.4 ksi) for FeMn — about 4.4 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Alloy 49 or FeMn?

FeMn is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while Alloy 49 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Alloy 49 or FeMn?

Alloy 49. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against not recommended (5/100) for FeMn; for welding the order is Alloy 49 first (very good, 70/100) then FeMn (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Alloy 49 and FeMn side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.