FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A572 vs A588

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A572 and A588 are both steel grades. A588 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for A572, about 6% more; tensile strength follows at 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi). A588 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 22% for A572, and A588 is harder (155 HB vs 145 HB).

A588Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

A572 vs A588: properties

A572A588

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
25%

Reduction in Area

50%
45%

Compressive Strength

360 MPa52.2 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Shear Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

215 MPa31.2 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

145 HB
155 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

78 HRB
83 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

152 HV
163 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
52 W/m·K30 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9 % IACS
8.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.48 µΩ·in
2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.87 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.61 V
-0.65 V

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
32 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
58%

Weldability

82 / 100
78 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 55 / 100 · Formability (cold) 60 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

61 kN·m/kg
66 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

324 kJ/m³
361 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

13 mm²/s
14.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
12

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.5 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA572A588

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA572A588
Default conditionHRHR
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

A572 vs A588 — frequently asked

Is A588 stronger than A572?

Yes. A588 has a typical yield strength of 380 MPa (55.1 ksi) against 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) for A572 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A572 or A588?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose A572 over A588?

Pick A588 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A572 and A588 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.