FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A369 Grade FPA vs P355GH

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A369 Grade FPA and P355GH are both steel grades. P355GH is the stronger of the two: yield strength 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for A369 Grade FPA, about 54% more; tensile strength follows at 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 415 MPa (60.2 ksi). In exchange, A369 Grade FPA is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 24% for P355GH, and P355GH is harder (165 HB vs 120 HB). A369 Grade FPA runs hotter in service (425°C vs 380°C continuous) and A369 Grade FPA conducts electricity better (10 % IACS vs 8.2 % IACS).

A369 Grade FPAChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

P355GHChoose it when strength drives the design.

A369 Grade FPA vs P355GH: properties

A369 Grade FPAP355GH

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

415 MPa60.2 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
385 MPa55.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

35%
24%

Reduction in Area

58%
50%

Compressive Strength

250 MPa36.3 ksi
385 MPa55.8 ksi

Shear Strength

270 MPa39.2 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
245 MPa35.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

95 J70.1 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

68 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

126 HV
173 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,460°C2,660 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,520°C2,768 °F
1,510°C2,750 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

52 W/m·K30 BTU/hr·ft·°F
48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
461 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
380°C716 °F

Min Service Temperature

-29°C-20 °F
-10°C14 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

10 % IACS
8.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.69 µΩ·in
2.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.27 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.62 V · Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
58 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
62%

Weldability

92 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

75 / 100
64 / 100

Castability

55 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
1.9 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

53 kN·m/kg
70 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

156 kJ/m³
353 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

14.1 mm²/s
13.3 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleP355GHA369 Grade FPA

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA369 Grade FPAP355GH
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A369 Grade FPA vs P355GH — frequently asked

Is P355GH stronger than A369 Grade FPA?

Yes. P355GH has a typical yield strength of 385 MPa (55.8 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for A369 Grade FPA — about 54% more. Tensile strength is 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) vs 415 MPa (60.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A369 Grade FPA or P355GH?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, A369 Grade FPA or P355GH?

A369 Grade FPA, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 65/100 against 58/100 for P355GH; for welding the order is A369 Grade FPA first (excellent, 92/100) then P355GH (excellent, 85/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A369 Grade FPA and P355GH side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.