FabDigitFabDigit

Steel A3 vs A9

Steel · grade comparison

Steel A3 and A9 are both steel grades. A3 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for A9, about 8% more. On the shop floor, A9 machines more easily (good vs fair), A9 welds better (30 vs 15 out of 100), and A3 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than A9 (high, $$$$).

A3Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

A9Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when it will be welded.

A3 vs A9: properties

A3A9

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

203 GPa29.4 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

79 GPa11.5 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
745 MPa108 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

430 MPa62.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

20%
22%

Reduction in Area

35%
45%

Compressive Strength

900 MPa131 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Shear Strength

460 MPa66.7 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
60 J44.3 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

217 HB
220 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

96 HRB
97 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

19 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

228 HV
230 HV

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

—
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.86 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.78 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,470°C2,678 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.7 µm/m·K5.9 µin/in·°F
11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.7 % IACS
2.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.58 V

Corrosion Resistance

16 / 100
18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

42%
45%

Weldability

15 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb
35 MJ/kg15,047 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
2.7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
70 L/kg8.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

97 kN·m/kg
96 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.8 MN·m/kg
25.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

455 kJ/m³
400 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.6 mm²/s
6.7 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA3A9

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityA3A9
CNC machiningYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

A3 vs A9 — frequently asked

Is A3 stronger than A9?

Yes. A3 has a typical yield strength of 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for A9 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 745 MPa (108 ksi).

Which is cheaper, A3 or A9?

A3 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while A9 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, A3 or A9?

A9. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (38/100) for A3; for welding the order is A9 first (poor, 30/100) then A3 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in A3 and A9 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.