FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1.2510 vs A3

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1.2510 and A3 are both steel grades, both tool steel. Both yield at about 450 MPa — strength does not separate them. A3 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 15% for 1.2510, and A3 is harder (19 HRC vs 16 HRC). 1.2510 conducts heat better (33 W/m·K vs 24 W/m·K).

A3Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.2510 vs A3: properties

1.2510A3

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
203 GPa29.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

750 MPa109 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

15%
20%

Shear Strength

470 MPa68.2 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

210 HB
217 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

95 HRB
96 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

16 HRC
19 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

220 HV
228 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Reduction in Area 35% · Compressive Strength 900 MPa131 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.86 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,350°C2,462 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,470°C2,678 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

33 W/m·K19.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
10.7 µm/m·K5.9 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7 % IACS
2.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.84 µΩ·in
6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
16 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

42 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
42%

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 15 / 100 · Castability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb
36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.6 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

96 kN·m/kg
97 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.9 MN·m/kg
25.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

482 kJ/m³
455 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.2 mm²/s
6.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA31.2510

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.2510A3
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 38 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, CrN, DLC, E-Coating and 26 more.

1.2510 vs A3 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 1.2510 and A3?

Steel 1.2510 and A3 are both steel grades, both tool steel. Both yield at about 450 MPa — strength does not separate them. A3 is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 15% for 1.2510, and A3 is harder (19 HRC vs 16 HRC).

Which is cheaper, 1.2510 or A3?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 1.2510 over A3?

Pick A3 when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.2510 and A3 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.