FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 42CrMo4 vs X8Ni9

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 42CrMo4 and X8Ni9 are both steel grades. X8Ni9 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for 42CrMo4, about 25% more. X8Ni9 is the more ductile: elongation 24% versus 14% for 42CrMo4, and 42CrMo4 is harder (245 HB vs 215 HB). 42CrMo4 is stiffer (210 GPa vs 195 GPa) and 42CrMo4 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous). On the shop floor, 42CrMo4 machines more easily (50 vs 40 out of 100), X8Ni9 welds better (good vs fair), and 42CrMo4 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than X8Ni9 (premium, $$$).

42CrMo4Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

X8Ni9Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

42CrMo4 vs X8Ni9: properties

42CrMo4X8Ni9

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

850 MPa123 ksi
745 MPa108 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
24%

Reduction in Area

40%
65%

Compressive Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
690 MPa100 ksi

Shear Strength

510 MPa74 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
220 J162 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

245 HB
215 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

23 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

258 HV
225 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
96 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,430°C2,606 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
29 W/m·K16.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
10.2 µm/m·K5.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
3.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.65 V

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
45%

Weldability

35 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
52 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb
40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
65 L/kg7.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

108 kN·m/kg
95 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

720 kJ/m³
1,221 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.5 mm²/s
8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
11

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale42CrMo4X8Ni9

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability42CrMo4X8Ni9
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

42CrMo4 vs X8Ni9 — frequently asked

Is X8Ni9 stronger than 42CrMo4?

Yes. X8Ni9 has a typical yield strength of 690 MPa (100 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for 42CrMo4 — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 745 MPa (108 ksi) vs 850 MPa (123 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 42CrMo4 or X8Ni9?

42CrMo4 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while X8Ni9 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 42CrMo4 or X8Ni9?

42CrMo4, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 40/100 for X8Ni9; for welding the order is X8Ni9 first (good, 60/100) then 42CrMo4 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 42CrMo4 and X8Ni9 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.