FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 42CrMo4 vs X12Ni5

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 42CrMo4 and X12Ni5 are both steel grades. 42CrMo4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for X12Ni5, about 25% more; tensile strength follows at 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). In exchange, X12Ni5 is the more ductile: elongation 24% versus 14% for 42CrMo4, and 42CrMo4 is harder (245 HB vs 185 HB). 42CrMo4 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous) and 42CrMo4 conducts heat better (42.6 W/m·K vs 33 W/m·K). On the shop floor, X12Ni5 welds better (good vs fair).

42CrMo4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

X12Ni5Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

42CrMo4 vs X12Ni5: properties

42CrMo4X12Ni5

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
165 GPa23.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

850 MPa123 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
24%

Reduction in Area

40%
60%

Compressive Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Shear Strength

510 MPa74 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
170 MPa·√m155 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
180 J133 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

245 HB
185 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

23 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

258 HV
195 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
90 HRB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,440°C2,624 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
33 W/m·K19.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
11.2 µm/m·K6.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-120°C-184 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
6.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
2.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

12 / 100
16 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
52 / 100

Weldability

35 / 100
68 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
62 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 55%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb
38 MJ/kg16,337 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
65 L/kg7.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

108 kN·m/kg
79 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

720 kJ/m³
472 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.5 mm²/s
8.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale42CrMo4X12Ni5

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability42CrMo4X12Ni5
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

42CrMo4 vs X12Ni5 — frequently asked

Is 42CrMo4 stronger than X12Ni5?

Yes. 42CrMo4 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) for X12Ni5 — about 25% more. Tensile strength is 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 42CrMo4 or X12Ni5?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 42CrMo4 or X12Ni5?

X12Ni5. Its weldability rates good (68/100) against fair (35/100) for 42CrMo4.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 42CrMo4 and X12Ni5 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.