FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 42CrMo4 vs P690QL2

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 42CrMo4 and P690QL2 are both steel grades. P690QL2 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 750 MPa (109 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for 42CrMo4, about 36% more. P690QL2 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 14% for 42CrMo4, and P690QL2 is harder (25 HRC vs 23 HRC). 42CrMo4 conducts heat better (42.6 W/m·K vs 38 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 42CrMo4 machines more easily (50 vs 35 out of 100), P690QL2 welds better (good vs fair), and P690QL2 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 42CrMo4 (standard, $$).

42CrMo4Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

P690QL2Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

42CrMo4 vs P690QL2: properties

42CrMo4P690QL2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

850 MPa123 ksi
840 MPa122 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
18%

Reduction in Area

40%
55%

Compressive Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Shear Strength

510 MPa74 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
130 MPa·√m118 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
150 J111 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

245 HB
255 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

23 HRC
25 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

258 HV
268 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 210 GPa30.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,430°C2,606 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
38 W/m·K22 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
—

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
2.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.84 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
—

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
35 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
40%

Weldability

35 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
—

Polishability

70 / 100
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
2.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

108 kN·m/kg
107 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

720 kJ/m³
1,339 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.5 mm²/s
10.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
12

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.8 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale42CrMo4P690QL2

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability42CrMo4P690QL2
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

42CrMo4 vs P690QL2 — frequently asked

Is P690QL2 stronger than 42CrMo4?

Yes. P690QL2 has a typical yield strength of 750 MPa (109 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for 42CrMo4 — about 36% more. Tensile strength is 840 MPa (122 ksi) vs 850 MPa (123 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 42CrMo4 or P690QL2?

P690QL2 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 42CrMo4 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 42CrMo4 or P690QL2?

42CrMo4, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 35/100 for P690QL2; for welding the order is P690QL2 first (good, 60/100) then 42CrMo4 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 42CrMo4 and P690QL2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.