FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 42CrMo4 vs E355M

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 42CrMo4 and E355M are both steel grades. 42CrMo4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for E355M, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). In exchange, E355M is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 14% for 42CrMo4, and 42CrMo4 is harder (245 HB vs 160 HB). E355M conducts electricity better (9 % IACS vs 7.8 % IACS). On the shop floor, E355M welds better (excellent vs fair) and E355M sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 42CrMo4 (standard, $$).

42CrMo4Choose it when strength drives the design.

E355MChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

42CrMo4 vs E355M: properties

42CrMo4E355M

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
166 GPa24.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

850 MPa123 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
26%

Reduction in Area

40%
60%

Compressive Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Shear Strength

510 MPa74 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
120 J88.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

245 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

23 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

258 HV
168 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
83 HRB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 210 GPa30.5 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,460°C2,660 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,515°C2,759 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
247 J/g106 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
1.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.48 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.65 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
60%

Weldability

35 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
72 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

—
0 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb
25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

108 kN·m/kg
66 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

720 kJ/m³
381 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.5 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
9

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.8 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale42CrMo4E355M

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability42CrMo4E355M
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

42CrMo4 vs E355M — frequently asked

Is 42CrMo4 stronger than E355M?

Yes. 42CrMo4 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for E355M — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 42CrMo4 or E355M?

E355M is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 42CrMo4 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 42CrMo4 or E355M?

E355M. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (50/100) for 42CrMo4; for welding the order is E355M first (excellent, 88/100) then 42CrMo4 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 42CrMo4 and E355M side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.