FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 42CrMo4 vs 60CrMnA

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 42CrMo4 and 60CrMnA are both steel grades. 60CrMnA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,180 MPa (171 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for 42CrMo4, about 115% more; tensile strength follows at 1,320 MPa (191 ksi) vs 850 MPa (123 ksi). In exchange, 42CrMo4 is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 11% for 60CrMnA, and 60CrMnA is harder (390 HB vs 245 HB). 42CrMo4 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 250°C continuous). On the shop floor, 42CrMo4 machines more easily (fair vs poor), 42CrMo4 welds better (fair vs poor), and 60CrMnA sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 42CrMo4 (standard, $$).

42CrMo4Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

60CrMnAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

42CrMo4 vs 60CrMnA: properties

42CrMo460CrMnA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

210 GPa30.5 Msi
206 GPa29.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

850 MPa123 ksi
1,320 MPa191 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
1,180 MPa171 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
11%

Reduction in Area

40%
35%

Compressive Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
1,200 MPa174 ksi

Shear Strength

510 MPa74 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
590 MPa85.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in
65 MPa·√m59.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

245 HB
390 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

23 HRC
41 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

258 HV
410 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42 W/m·K24.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
12.4 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
250°C482 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

7.8 % IACS
8 % IACS

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V · Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
30 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

55%
35%

Weldability

35 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
10 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

—
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb
26 MJ/kg11,178 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.2 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

108 kN·m/kg
168 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.8 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

720 kJ/m³
3,380 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.5 mm²/s
11.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

14
22

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale42CrMo460CrMnA

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability42CrMo460CrMnA
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionHR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

42CrMo4 vs 60CrMnA — frequently asked

Is 60CrMnA stronger than 42CrMo4?

Yes. 60CrMnA has a typical yield strength of 1,180 MPa (171 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for 42CrMo4 — about 115% more. Tensile strength is 1,320 MPa (191 ksi) vs 850 MPa (123 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 42CrMo4 or 60CrMnA?

60CrMnA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 42CrMo4 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 42CrMo4 or 60CrMnA?

42CrMo4. Its machinability rates fair (50/100) against poor (30/100) for 60CrMnA; for welding the order is 42CrMo4 first (fair, 35/100) then 60CrMnA (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 42CrMo4 and 60CrMnA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.