FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 34MnB5 vs S275ML

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 34MnB5 and S275ML are both steel grades. 34MnB5 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for S275ML, about 33% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi). In exchange, S275ML is the more ductile: elongation 28% versus 14% for 34MnB5, and 34MnB5 is harder (185 HB vs 130 HB). 34MnB5 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous) and S275ML conducts electricity better (9 % IACS vs 8 % IACS). On the shop floor, S275ML welds better (excellent vs good) and S275ML sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 34MnB5 (standard, $$).

34MnB5Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

S275MLChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when it will be welded.

34MnB5 vs S275ML: properties

34MnB5S275ML

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

420 MPa60.9 ksi
315 MPa45.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
28%

Reduction in Area

45%
60%

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in
120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
130 J95.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

185 HB
130 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

89 HRB
72 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

195 HV
137 HV

Compressive Strength

—
315 MPa45.7 ksi

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 210 GPa30.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,460°C2,660 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F
12 µm/m·K6.7 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

250 J/g107 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8 % IACS
9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in
1.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.48 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.65 V

Corrosion Resistance

11 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
70%

Weldability

55 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
72 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

79 kN·m/kg
55 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

420 kJ/m³
236 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

11.9 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
8

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26.8 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale34MnB5S275ML

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability34MnB5S275ML
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionCR—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Black OxideYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
E-CoatingYes—
Hot-Dip GalvanizingYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—
Tin PlatingYes—
Zinc PlatingYes—
Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) CoatingYes—
Zinc-Nickel PlatingYes—

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

34MnB5 vs S275ML — frequently asked

Is 34MnB5 stronger than S275ML?

Yes. 34MnB5 has a typical yield strength of 420 MPa (60.9 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for S275ML — about 33% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 430 MPa (62.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 34MnB5 or S275ML?

S275ML is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 34MnB5 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 34MnB5 or S275ML?

S275ML, by a small margin. Both rate good for machinability — 60/100 against 55/100 for 34MnB5; for welding the order is S275ML first (excellent, 92/100) then 34MnB5 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 34MnB5 and S275ML side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.