FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 30P105 vs M4

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 30P105 and M4 are both steel grades. M4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for 30P105, about 75% more; tensile strength follows at 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi). M4 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 8% for 30P105, and M4 is harder (265 HV vs 180 HV). 30P105 is lighter (7.65 g/cm³ vs 7.97 g/cm³ for M4) and M4 is stiffer (217 GPa vs 120 GPa). On the shop floor, 30P105 machines more easily (fair vs poor), 30P105 welds better (fair vs poor), and 30P105 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than M4 (specialty, $$$$$).

30P105Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

M4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

30P105 vs M4: properties

30P105M4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

120 GPa17.4 Msi
217 GPa31.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

78 GPa11.3 Msi
84 GPa12.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
880 MPa128 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

315 MPa45.7 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
12%

Shear Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

165 MPa23.9 ksi
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

85 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

180 HV
265 HV

Reduction in Area

—
25%

Compressive Strength

—
1,600 MPa232 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
22 MPa·√m20 ksi·√in

Hardness, Brinell

—
250 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
24 HRC

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 165 GPa23.9 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.97 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,250°C2,282 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

21 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
22 W/m·K12.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.6 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.6 % IACS
2.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m18.9 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
-0.58 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
25%

Weldability

40 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
12 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Castability

—
20 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

—
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb
58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.6 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

46 kN·m/kg
110 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

15.7 MN·m/kg
27.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

413 kJ/m³
697 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.7 mm²/s
6.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
8

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleM430P105

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability30P105M4
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

30P105 vs M4 — frequently asked

Is M4 stronger than 30P105?

Yes. M4 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for 30P105 — about 75% more. Tensile strength is 880 MPa (128 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 30P105 or M4?

30P105 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while M4 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 30P105 or M4?

30P105. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (25/100) for M4; for welding the order is 30P105 first (fair, 40/100) then M4 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 30P105 and M4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.