FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 24CrMo13-6 vs 42CrMo4

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 24CrMo13-6 and 42CrMo4 are both steel grades. 24CrMo13-6 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 870 MPa (126 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for 42CrMo4, about 58% more; tensile strength follows at 1,080 MPa (157 ksi) vs 850 MPa (123 ksi). 24CrMo13-6 is harder — 330 HB against 245 HB for 42CrMo4 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 24CrMo13-6 runs hotter in service (500°C vs 400°C continuous) and 42CrMo4 conducts heat better (42.6 W/m·K vs 34 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 42CrMo4 machines more easily (50 vs 40 out of 100), 42CrMo4 welds better (fair vs poor), and 42CrMo4 forms better (fair vs poor).

24CrMo13-6Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

42CrMo4Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when it will be welded.

24CrMo13-6 vs 42CrMo4: properties

24CrMo13-642CrMo4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

81 GPa11.7 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,080 MPa157 ksi
850 MPa123 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

870 MPa126 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

13%
14%

Reduction in Area

45%
40%

Compressive Strength

880 MPa128 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Shear Strength

650 MPa94.3 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

50 J36.9 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

330 HB
245 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

34 HRC
23 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

345 HV
258 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 210 GPa30.5 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Liquidus Temperature

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

34 W/m·K19.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

500°C932 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

2.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m10.6 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Electrical Conductivity

—
7.8 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

15 / 100
12 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

50%
55%

Weldability

20 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.4 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Same in both: Embodied Water 60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

138 kN·m/kg
108 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.9 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,802 kJ/m³
720 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

9.5 mm²/s
11.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale42CrMo424CrMo13-6

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability24CrMo13-642CrMo4
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

24CrMo13-6 vs 42CrMo4 — frequently asked

Is 24CrMo13-6 stronger than 42CrMo4?

Yes. 24CrMo13-6 has a typical yield strength of 870 MPa (126 ksi) against 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) for 42CrMo4 — about 58% more. Tensile strength is 1,080 MPa (157 ksi) vs 850 MPa (123 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 24CrMo13-6 or 42CrMo4?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 24CrMo13-6 or 42CrMo4?

42CrMo4, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 40/100 for 24CrMo13-6; for welding the order is 42CrMo4 first (fair, 35/100) then 24CrMo13-6 (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 24CrMo13-6 and 42CrMo4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.