FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 18B2 vs 42CrMo4

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 18B2 and 42CrMo4 are both steel grades. 42CrMo4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for 18B2, about 28% more; tensile strength follows at 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi). 42CrMo4 is harder — 245 HB against 155 HB for 18B2 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 42CrMo4 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous) and 18B2 conducts electricity better (9.5 % IACS vs 7.8 % IACS). On the shop floor, 18B2 machines more easily (good vs fair), 18B2 welds better (good vs fair), and 18B2 forms better (very good vs fair).

18B2Choose it when the part is machined in volume, or when it will be welded.

42CrMo4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

18B2 vs 42CrMo4: properties

18B242CrMo4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

207 GPa30 Msi
210 GPa30.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
850 MPa123 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

430 MPa62.4 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Reduction in Area

58%
40%

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

155 HB
245 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

163 HV
258 HV

Compressive Strength

—
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
23 HRC

Same in both: Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Elongation at Break 14%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Same in both: Density 7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

46 W/m·K26.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

350°C662 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

9.5 % IACS
7.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.09 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

10 / 100
12 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

65%
55%

Weldability

65 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

66 kN·m/kg
108 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.4 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

447 kJ/m³
720 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.5 mm²/s
11.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

10
14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale42CrMo418B2

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability18B242CrMo4
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

18B2 vs 42CrMo4 — frequently asked

Is 42CrMo4 stronger than 18B2?

Yes. 42CrMo4 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for 18B2 — about 28% more. Tensile strength is 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 520 MPa (75.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 18B2 or 42CrMo4?

18B2 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 42CrMo4 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 18B2 or 42CrMo4?

18B2. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (50/100) for 42CrMo4; for welding the order is 18B2 first (good, 65/100) then 42CrMo4 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 18B2 and 42CrMo4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.