FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 100CrMo7-3 vs 42CrMo4

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 100CrMo7-3 and 42CrMo4 are both steel grades. 42CrMo4 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for 100CrMo7-3, about 28% more; tensile strength follows at 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi). In exchange, 100CrMo7-3 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 14% for 42CrMo4, and 42CrMo4 is harder (245 HB vs 207 HB). 42CrMo4 runs hotter in service (400°C vs 200°C continuous) and 42CrMo4 conducts electricity better (7.8 % IACS vs 3.9 % IACS). On the shop floor, 42CrMo4 welds better (fair vs not recommended).

100CrMo7-3Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

42CrMo4Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

100CrMo7-3 vs 42CrMo4: properties

100CrMo7-342CrMo4

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

165 GPa23.9 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
850 MPa123 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

430 MPa62.4 ksi
550 MPa79.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

18%
14%

Reduction in Area

45%
40%

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
510 MPa74 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

320 MPa46.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

15 J11.1 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

207 HB
245 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

95 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

215 HV
258 HV

Compressive Strength

—
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
75 MPa·√m68.3 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
23 HRC

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 210 GPa30.5 Msi · Shear Modulus 80 GPa11.6 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.82 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,455°C2,651 °F
1,495°C2,723 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

44 W/m·K25.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
42.6 W/m·K24.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
473 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F
12.3 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
400°C752 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.9 % IACS
7.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.3 µΩ·in
2.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m8.66 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.6 V · Corrosion Resistance 12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
55%

Weldability

12 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb
30 MJ/kg12,898 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.3 kg CO₂/kg
2.2 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

90 kN·m/kg
108 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.9 MN·m/kg
26.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

440 kJ/m³
720 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

12.2 mm²/s
11.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

13
14

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale42CrMo4100CrMo7-3

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability100CrMo7-342CrMo4
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—HR
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

100CrMo7-3 vs 42CrMo4 — frequently asked

Is 42CrMo4 stronger than 100CrMo7-3?

Yes. 42CrMo4 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) for 100CrMo7-3 — about 28% more. Tensile strength is 850 MPa (123 ksi) vs 700 MPa (102 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 100CrMo7-3 or 42CrMo4?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 100CrMo7-3 or 42CrMo4?

42CrMo4, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 50/100 against 45/100 for 100CrMo7-3; for welding the order is 42CrMo4 first (fair, 35/100) then 100CrMo7-3 (not recommended, 12/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 100CrMo7-3 and 42CrMo4 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.