FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1008 vs Q195

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1008 and Q195 are both steel grades. Q195 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for 1008, about 23% more; tensile strength follows at 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi). Q195 is the more ductile: elongation 36% versus 30% for 1008, and Q195 is harder (98 HB vs 86 HB). 1008 runs hotter in service (425°C vs 300°C continuous) and 1008 conducts heat better (60 W/m·K vs 52 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Q195 machines more easily (good vs fair).

1008Choose it when the part sees heat.

Q195Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1008 vs Q195: properties

1008Q195

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
206 GPa29.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
79 GPa11.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

175 MPa25.4 ksi
215 MPa31.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
36%

Reduction in Area

55%
62%

Shear Strength

185 MPa26.8 ksi
220 MPa31.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

90 J66.4 ft·lbf
55 J40.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

86 HB
98 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

45 HRB
55 HRB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
120 MPa·√m109 ksi·√in

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.87 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,495°C2,723 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Same in both: Liquidus Temperature 1,530°C2,786 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

60 W/m·K34.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
52 W/m·K30 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

481 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
475 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.2 µm/m·K6.8 µin/in·°F
11.9 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
300°C572 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 247 J/g106 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

11.5 % IACS
10.5 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m5.91 µΩ·in
1.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m6.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.65 V · Corrosion Resistance 10 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

48 / 100
60 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
62%

Weldability

95 / 100
96 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
93 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

1.9 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

40 L/kg4.8 gal/lb
45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
22%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 25 MJ/kg10,748 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

38 kN·m/kg
42 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.4 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

77 kJ/m³
112 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

15.9 mm²/s
13.9 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1008Q195

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1008Q195
CNC machining—Yes
Default conditionHRCR
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
TiAlN—Yes
TiB2—Yes
TiCN—Yes
TiN—Yes
WC/C—Yes
ZrN—Yes

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 22 finishes: Black Oxide, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Hot-Dip Galvanizing, Manganese Phosphate, Nickel Plating and 10 more.

1008 vs Q195 — frequently asked

Is Q195 stronger than 1008?

Yes. Q195 has a typical yield strength of 215 MPa (31.2 ksi) against 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) for 1008 — about 23% more. Tensile strength is 330 MPa (47.9 ksi) vs 300 MPa (43.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1008 or Q195?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1008 or Q195?

Q195. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (48/100) for 1008.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1008 and Q195 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.