FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 1.2363 vs A2

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 1.2363 and A2 are both steel grades. 1.2363 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) for A2, about 6% more; tensile strength follows at 790 MPa (115 ksi) vs 740 MPa (107 ksi). In exchange, A2 is the more ductile: elongation 22% versus 16% for 1.2363. A2 conducts heat better (26 W/m·K vs 21 W/m·K).

1.2363Choose it when strength drives the design.

A2Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.2363 vs A2: properties

1.2363A2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

205 GPa29.7 Msi
203 GPa29.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

790 MPa115 ksi
740 MPa107 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

500 MPa72.5 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

16%
22%

Reduction in Area

35%
45%

Compressive Strength

900 MPa131 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Shear Strength

480 MPa69.6 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

40 J29.5 ft·lbf
30 J22.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

220 HB
217 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

97 HRB
96 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.28 · Hardness, Vickers 230 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,460°C2,660 °F
1,465°C2,669 °F

Same in both: Density 7.86 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

21 W/m·K12.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
26 W/m·K15 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11 µm/m·K6.1 µin/in·°F
10.7 µm/m·K5.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
425°C797 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.7 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.6 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

18 / 100
20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
60%

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
35 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Castability

—
20 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

33 MJ/kg14,187 BTU/lb
36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb
65 L/kg7.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

40%
35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

101 kN·m/kg
94 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.1 MN·m/kg
25.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

610 kJ/m³
544 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.8 mm²/s
7.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

7
9

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleA21.2363

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.2363A2
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
E-Coating—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
Hot-Dip Galvanizing—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes

They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

1.2363 vs A2 — frequently asked

Is 1.2363 stronger than A2?

Yes. 1.2363 has a typical yield strength of 500 MPa (72.5 ksi) against 470 MPa (68.2 ksi) for A2 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 790 MPa (115 ksi) vs 740 MPa (107 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.2363 or A2?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1.2363 or A2?

A2, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 40/100 for 1.2363.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.2363 and A2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.