FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel ER16-8-2 vs ER308

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel ER16-8-2 and ER308 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 400 MPa — strength does not separate them. On the shop floor, ER308 welds better (excellent vs very good), ER16-8-2 forms better (65 vs 55 out of 100), and ER308 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ER16-8-2 (high, $$$$).

ER308Choose it when it will be welded, or when cost is the deciding factor.

ER16-8-2 vs ER308: properties

ER16-8-2ER308

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

196 GPa28.4 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
145 GPa21 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Elongation at Break

38%
40%

Reduction in Area

50%
55%

Compressive Strength

410 MPa59.5 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Shear Strength

390 MPa56.6 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
185 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

88 HRB
90 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
195 HV

Same in both: Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 400 MPa58 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 240 MPa34.8 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in · Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT) 90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Liquidus Temperature

1,445°C2,633 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Same in both: Density 7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
15.5 W/m·K9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F
16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

275 J/g118 BTU/lb
280 J/g120 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 760°C1,400 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.3 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.5 µΩ·in
7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
45%

Weldability

78 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

55%
45%

Same in both: Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

74 kN·m/kg
76 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.8 MN·m/kg
24.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

408 kJ/m³
410 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.8 mm²/s
3.9 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308ER16-8-2

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityER16-8-2ER308
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

ER16-8-2 vs ER308 — frequently asked

What is the difference between ER16-8-2 and ER308?

Stainless Steel ER16-8-2 and ER308 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 400 MPa — strength does not separate them. On the shop floor, ER308 welds better (excellent vs very good), ER16-8-2 forms better (65 vs 55 out of 100), and ER308 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than ER16-8-2 (high, $$$$).

Which is cheaper, ER16-8-2 or ER308?

ER308 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while ER16-8-2 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, ER16-8-2 or ER308?

ER308. Its weldability rates excellent (95/100) against very good (78/100) for ER16-8-2.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ER16-8-2 and ER308 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.