FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel E2553 vs ER308

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel E2553 and ER308 are both stainless steel grades. E2553 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for ER308, about 55% more; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 600 MPa (87 ksi). In exchange, ER308 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 22% for E2553, and E2553 is harder (265 HB vs 185 HB). ER308 runs hotter in service (760°C vs 250°C continuous) and ER308 conducts electricity better (2.4 % IACS vs 2.1 % IACS). On the shop floor, ER308 machines more easily (fair vs poor), ER308 welds better (excellent vs very good), and ER308 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than E2553 (high, $$$$).

E2553Choose it when strength drives the design.

ER308Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

E2553 vs ER308: properties

E2553ER308

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

200 GPa29 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
145 GPa21 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

820 MPa119 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

620 MPa89.9 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

22%
40%

Reduction in Area

45%
55%

Compressive Strength

630 MPa91.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Shear Strength

500 MPa72.5 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

90 MPa·√m81.9 ksi·√in
150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

45 J33.2 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

265 HB
185 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

285 HV
195 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
90 HRB

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.81 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,370°C2,498 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,445°C2,633 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
15.5 W/m·K9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.8 µm/m·K7.1 µin/in·°F
16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
280 J/g120 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
760°C1,400 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.1 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m33.1 µΩ·in
7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

20%
45%

Weldability

70 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.8 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

55%
45%

Same in both: Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

105 kN·m/kg
76 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
24.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

961 kJ/m³
410 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4 mm²/s
3.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308E2553

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityE2553ER308
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

E2553 vs ER308 — frequently asked

Is E2553 stronger than ER308?

Yes. E2553 has a typical yield strength of 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for ER308 — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 600 MPa (87 ksi).

Which is cheaper, E2553 or ER308?

ER308 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while E2553 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, E2553 or ER308?

ER308. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (28/100) for E2553; for welding the order is ER308 first (excellent, 95/100) then E2553 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in E2553 and ER308 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.