FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel E349 vs ER308Si

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel E349 and ER308Si are both stainless steel grades. E349 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for ER308Si, about 38% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 600 MPa (87 ksi). In exchange, ER308Si is the more ductile: elongation 38% versus 30% for E349, and E349 is harder (200 HB vs 175 HB). On the shop floor, ER308Si machines more easily (fair vs poor), ER308Si welds better (excellent vs very good), and ER308Si sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than E349 (high, $$$$).

E349Choose it when strength drives the design.

ER308SiChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

E349 vs ER308Si: properties

E349ER308Si

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

196 GPa28.4 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
38%

Reduction in Area

45%
55%

Compressive Strength

550 MPa79.8 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Shear Strength

460 MPa66.7 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

280 MPa40.6 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
140 MPa·√m127 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

42 J31 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

200 HB
175 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

93 HRB
88 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

210 HV
185 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.95 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,385°C2,525 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

815°C1,499 °F
760°C1,400 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.2 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m30.7 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
68 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.08 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
45%

Weldability

80 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

35 / 100
60 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
55%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

96 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.8 MN·m/kg
24.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

772 kJ/m³
410 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 3.8 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308SiE349

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityE349ER308Si
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

E349 vs ER308Si — frequently asked

Is E349 stronger than ER308Si?

Yes. E349 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for ER308Si — about 38% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 600 MPa (87 ksi).

Which is cheaper, E349 or ER308Si?

ER308Si is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while E349 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, E349 or ER308Si?

ER308Si. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (28/100) for E349; for welding the order is ER308Si first (excellent, 95/100) then E349 (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in E349 and ER308Si side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.