FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel E316H vs ER308H

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel E316H and ER308H are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 425 MPa — strength does not separate them. E316H is harder — 185 HB against 175 HB for ER308H — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, ER308H sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than E316H (high, $$$$).

E316HChoose it when surface hardness matters.

ER308HChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

E316H vs ER308H: properties

E316HER308H

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

166 GPa24.1 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

425 MPa61.6 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Reduction in Area

50%
55%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

70 J51.6 ft·lbf
85 J62.7 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

185 HB
175 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

90 HRB
87 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

195 HV
185 HV

Compressive Strength

—
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 590 MPa85.6 ksi · Elongation at Break 38% · Shear Strength 400 MPa58 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.99 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,390°C2,534 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,440°C2,624 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15.5 W/m·K9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 800°C1,472 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.3 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.5 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
58 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.05 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

42%
40%

Weldability

90 / 100
88 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 38 / 100 · Formability (cold) 55 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100 · Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

55%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Water 130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

74 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.2 MN·m/kg
24.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

468 kJ/m³
439 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.9 mm²/s
4.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308HE316H

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityE316HER308H
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

E316H vs ER308H — frequently asked

What is the difference between E316H and ER308H?

Stainless Steel E316H and ER308H are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 425 MPa — strength does not separate them. E316H is harder — 185 HB against 175 HB for ER308H — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

Which is cheaper, E316H or ER308H?

ER308H is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while E316H is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose E316H over ER308H?

Pick E316H when surface hardness matters. Pick ER308H when cost is the deciding factor.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in E316H and ER308H side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.