FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel E309LMo vs ER308

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel E309LMo and ER308 are both stainless steel grades. E309LMo is the stronger of the two: yield strength 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for ER308, about 8% more. In exchange, ER308 is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 36% for E309LMo. ER308 runs hotter in service (760°C vs 400°C continuous). On the shop floor, ER308 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than E309LMo (high, $$$$).

E309LMoChoose it when strength drives the design.

ER308Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

E309LMo vs ER308: properties

E309LMoER308

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

197 GPa28.6 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

430 MPa62.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

36%
40%

Reduction in Area

45%
55%

Compressive Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

140 MPa·√m127 ksi·√in
150 MPa·√m137 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
90 J66.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
185 HB

Hardness, Vickers

200 HV
195 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 145 GPa21 Msi · Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 600 MPa87 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 240 MPa34.8 ksi · Hardness, Rockwell B 90 HRB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
15.5 W/m·K9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F
16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
280 J/g120 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
760°C1,400 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.2 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m30.7 µΩ·in
7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

72 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

38%
45%

Weldability

90 / 100
95 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

—
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb
57 MJ/kg24,506 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

60%
45%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.9 MN·m/kg
24.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

469 kJ/m³
410 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.8 mm²/s
3.9 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Strength (UTS / density) 76 kN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleER308E309LMo

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityE309LMoER308
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

E309LMo vs ER308 — frequently asked

Is E309LMo stronger than ER308?

Yes. E309LMo has a typical yield strength of 430 MPa (62.4 ksi) against 400 MPa (58 ksi) for ER308 — about 8% more. Tensile strength is 600 MPa (87 ksi) vs 600 MPa (87 ksi).

Which is cheaper, E309LMo or ER308?

ER308 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while E309LMo is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, E309LMo or ER308?

ER308. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (32/100) for E309LMo; for welding the order is ER308 first (excellent, 95/100) then E309LMo (excellent, 90/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in E309LMo and ER308 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.