FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 420C vs CX

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 420C and CX are both stainless steel grades. CX is the stronger of the two: yield strength 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for 420C, about 96% more; tensile strength follows at 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 760 MPa (110 ksi). In exchange, 420C is the more ductile: elongation 17% versus 11% for CX, and CX is harder (310 HB vs 220 HB). 420C is stiffer (215 GPa vs 185 GPa) and 420C runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous). On the shop floor, CX welds better (very good vs poor) and CX sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 420C (premium, $$$).

420CChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

CXChoose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

420C vs CX: properties

420CCX

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

215 GPa31.2 Msi
185 GPa26.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

83 GPa12 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
155 GPa22.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

760 MPa110 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Elongation at Break

17%
11%

Reduction in Area

40%
35%

Compressive Strength

470 MPa68.2 ksi
950 MPa138 ksi

Shear Strength

460 MPa66.7 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

55 MPa·√m50.1 ksi·√in
70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

25 J18.4 ft·lbf
20 J14.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

220 HB
310 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

97 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

20 HRC
33 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

230 HV
330 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,500°C2,732 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Same in both: Density 7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
18 W/m·K10.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
430 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.5 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F
10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m31.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.35 V
-0.25 V

Corrosion Resistance

42 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
40%

Weldability

20 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

78 / 100
85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

50 MJ/kg21,496 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.4 kg CO₂/kg
6.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

90 L/kg10.8 gal/lb
110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

45%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

99 kN·m/kg
143 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

27.9 MN·m/kg
24 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

492 kJ/m³
2,189 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

8.5 mm²/s
5.4 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 10

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale420CCX

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability420CCX
CNC machiningYes—
3D printing—Yes
Default condition—As Printed
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
Electropolished (Metal AM)—Yes
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

420C vs CX — frequently asked

Is CX stronger than 420C?

Yes. CX has a typical yield strength of 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) for 420C — about 96% more. Tensile strength is 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 760 MPa (110 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 420C or CX?

CX is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 420C is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 420C or CX?

420C, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 38/100 for CX; for welding the order is CX first (very good, 70/100) then 420C (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 420C and CX side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.