FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 410S vs S40975

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 410S and S40975 are both stainless steel grades. 410S is the stronger of the two: yield strength 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for S40975, about 6% more. On the shop floor, S40975 forms better (very good vs good) and S40975 sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 410S (premium, $$$).

410SChoose it when strength drives the design.

S40975Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

410S vs S40975: properties

410SS40975

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

166 GPa24.1 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

460 MPa66.7 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

265 MPa38.4 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Compressive Strength

265 MPa38.4 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
45 J33.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
145 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
78 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

155 HV
152 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Elongation at Break 30% · Reduction in Area 65% · Shear Strength 290 MPa42.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,480°C2,696 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,530°C2,786 °F
1,510°C2,750 °F

Same in both: Density 7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.5 µm/m·K5.8 µin/in·°F
11.7 µm/m·K6.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

700°C1,292 °F
675°C1,247 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 24.9 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3 % IACS
2.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.7×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.4 µΩ·in
6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m23.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.35 V
-0.3 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
42 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

60%
65%

Weldability

70 / 100
78 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

40 MJ/kg17,197 BTU/lb
42 MJ/kg18,057 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.8 kg CO₂/kg
3.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

100 L/kg12 gal/lb
110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

65%
70%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

60 kN·m/kg
57 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

176 kJ/m³
156 kJ/m³

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 26 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 7 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleS40975410S

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability410SS40975
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionAnnealed—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

410S vs S40975 — frequently asked

Is 410S stronger than S40975?

Yes. 410S has a typical yield strength of 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for S40975 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 460 MPa (66.7 ksi) vs 440 MPa (63.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 410S or S40975?

S40975 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 410S is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 410S or S40975?

S40975. Its machinability rates good (55/100) against fair (50/100) for 410S; for welding the order is S40975 first (very good, 78/100) then 410S (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 410S and S40975 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.