FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 330 vs S33228

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 330 and S33228 are both stainless steel grades. S33228 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) for 330, about 6% more. S33228 is harder — 170 HB against 150 HB for 330 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, S33228 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than 330 (specialty, $$$$$).

S33228Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

330 vs S33228: properties

330S33228

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

196 GPa28.4 Msi
190 GPa27.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
73 GPa10.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

156 GPa22.6 Msi
150 GPa21.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
280 MPa40.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

43%
42%

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
390 MPa56.6 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
140 J103 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
170 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

79 HRB
86 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
180 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Reduction in Area 55% · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 250 MPa36.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.94 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,370°C2,498 °F
1,340°C2,444 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,390°C2,534 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

12.6 W/m·K7.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11.5 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14.4 µm/m·K8 µin/in·°F
15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,150°C2,102 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.02×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.2 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.7 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
25%

Weldability

62 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
60 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
90 MJ/kg38,693 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
7 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

74 kN·m/kg
78 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.7 MN·m/kg
24.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

186 kJ/m³
206 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
3.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale330S33228

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability330S33228
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionSolution Annealed—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

330 vs S33228 — frequently asked

Is S33228 stronger than 330?

Yes. S33228 has a typical tensile strength of 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) against 585 MPa (84.8 ksi) for 330 — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, 330 or S33228?

S33228 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while 330 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 330 or S33228?

330, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 25/100 for S33228.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 330 and S33228 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.