FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 330 vs S32050

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 330 and S32050 are both stainless steel grades. S32050 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) for 330, about 48% more; tensile strength follows at 780 MPa (113 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi). S32050 is the more ductile: elongation 48% versus 43% for 330, and S32050 is harder (200 HB vs 150 HB). 330 runs hotter in service (1,150°C vs 425°C continuous) and S32050 conducts electricity better (1.9 % IACS vs 1.7 % IACS). On the shop floor, 330 machines more easily (32 vs 22 out of 100) and S32050 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than 330 (specialty, $$$$$).

330Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

S32050Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

330 vs S32050: properties

330S32050

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

196 GPa28.4 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

156 GPa22.6 Msi
163 GPa23.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Elongation at Break

43%
48%

Reduction in Area

55%
65%

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
200 J148 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

79 HRB
92 HRB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in

Hardness, Vickers

—
210 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.94 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,370°C2,498 °F
1,320°C2,408 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,390°C2,534 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

12.6 W/m·K7.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11.5 W/m·K6.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14.4 µm/m·K8 µin/in·°F
14.8 µm/m·K8.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,150°C2,102 °F
425°C797 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
1.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.02×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.2 µΩ·in
9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
82 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
25%

Weldability

62 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
58 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
78 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.8 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

74 kN·m/kg
98 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.7 MN·m/kg
24.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

186 kJ/m³
410 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
2.9 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale330S32050

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability330S32050
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionSolution Annealed—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

330 vs S32050 — frequently asked

Is S32050 stronger than 330?

Yes. S32050 has a typical yield strength of 400 MPa (58 ksi) against 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) for 330 — about 48% more. Tensile strength is 780 MPa (113 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 330 or S32050?

S32050 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while 330 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 330 or S32050?

330, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 22/100 for S32050.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 330 and S32050 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.