FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 330 vs N08028

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 330 and N08028 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 270 MPa — strength does not separate them. N08028 is harder — 165 HB against 150 HB for 330 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 330 runs hotter in service (1,150°C vs 550°C continuous) and 330 conducts heat better (12.6 W/m·K vs 11 W/m·K). On the shop floor, N08028 welds better (very good vs good) and N08028 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than 330 (specialty, $$$$$).

330Choose it when the part sees heat.

N08028Choose it when surface hardness matters, or when it will be welded.

330 vs N08028: properties

330N08028

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

196 GPa28.4 Msi
195 GPa28.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

156 GPa22.6 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
600 MPa87 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

43%
45%

Reduction in Area

55%
60%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
270 MPa39.2 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
180 J133 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
165 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

79 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
175 HV

Same in both: Shear Strength 400 MPa58 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.94 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,370°C2,498 °F
1,350°C2,462 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,385°C2,525 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

12.6 W/m·K7.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
11 W/m·K6.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14.4 µm/m·K8 µin/in·°F
14.5 µm/m·K8.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,150°C2,102 °F
550°C1,022 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1.02×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.2 µΩ·in
1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.7 % IACS

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
85 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
22%

Weldability

62 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
75 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 65 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

74 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.7 MN·m/kg
24.4 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

186 kJ/m³
173 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
3.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
2

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale330N08028

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability330N08028
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionSolution Annealed—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

330 vs N08028 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 330 and N08028?

Stainless Steel 330 and N08028 are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 270 MPa — strength does not separate them. N08028 is harder — 165 HB against 150 HB for 330 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads.

Which is cheaper, 330 or N08028?

N08028 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while 330 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 330 or N08028?

330, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 25/100 for N08028; for welding the order is N08028 first (very good, 75/100) then 330 (good, 62/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 330 and N08028 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.