FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 330 vs 654 SMO

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 330 and 654 SMO are both stainless steel grades. 654 SMO is the stronger of the two: yield strength 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) against 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) for 330, about 81% more; tensile strength follows at 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi). 654 SMO is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 43% for 330, and 654 SMO is harder (220 HB vs 150 HB). 330 runs hotter in service (1,150°C vs 400°C continuous) and 330 conducts heat better (12.6 W/m·K vs 8.6 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 330 machines more easily (32 vs 18 out of 100) and 654 SMO sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than 330 (specialty, $$$$$).

330Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

654 SMOChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

330 vs 654 SMO: properties

330654 SMO

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

196 GPa28.4 Msi
190 GPa27.6 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
73 GPa10.6 Msi

Bulk Modulus

156 GPa22.6 Msi
158 GPa22.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
820 MPa119 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
490 MPa71.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

43%
50%

Reduction in Area

55%
65%

Shear Strength

400 MPa58 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
200 J148 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
220 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

79 HRB
95 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
235 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.94 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,370°C2,498 °F
1,320°C2,408 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,425°C2,597 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

12.6 W/m·K7.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
8.6 W/m·K5 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
510 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14.4 µm/m·K8 µin/in·°F
15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

290 J/g125 BTU/lb
265 J/g114 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,150°C2,102 °F
400°C752 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.02×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.2 µΩ·in
8.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m33.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

62 / 100
93 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

32 / 100
18 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
15%

Weldability

62 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
80 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 40%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

74 kN·m/kg
103 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.7 MN·m/kg
23.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

186 kJ/m³
632 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
2.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
2

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale330654 SMO

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability330654 SMO
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionSolution Annealed—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µm—
AlCrNYes—
AlTiNYes—
Black OxideYes—
CVD Al2O3Yes—
CVD TiCNYes—
CVD TiNYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chrome PlatingYes—
CrNYes—
DLCYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
HVOF CoatingYes—
MoS2Yes—
Multilayer CVDYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Passivation (Stainless Steel)Yes—

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

330 vs 654 SMO — frequently asked

Is 654 SMO stronger than 330?

Yes. 654 SMO has a typical yield strength of 490 MPa (71.1 ksi) against 270 MPa (39.2 ksi) for 330 — about 81% more. Tensile strength is 820 MPa (119 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 330 or 654 SMO?

654 SMO is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while 330 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 330 or 654 SMO?

330, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 32/100 against 18/100 for 654 SMO.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 330 and 654 SMO side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.