Stainless Steel 310 Cold Drawn vs 310 Solution Annealed
Stainless Steel · 310 temper comparison
310 Cold Drawn and 310 Solution Annealed are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, 310: Cold Drawn versus Solution Annealed. The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 310 Cold Drawn is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for 310 Solution Annealed, about 77% more; tensile strength follows at 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 655 MPa (95 ksi). In exchange, 310 Solution Annealed is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 25% for 310 Cold Drawn, and 310 Cold Drawn is harder (220 HB vs 150 HB).
310 Cold DrawnChoose it when strength drives the design.
310 Solution AnnealedChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
310 Cold Drawn vs 310 Solution Annealed: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all stainless steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all stainless steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
310 Cold Drawn310 Solution Annealed
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 200 GPa29 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 158 GPa22.9 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Compressive Strength 310 MPa45 ksi · Shear Strength 430 MPa62.4 ksi · Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 160 MPa·√m146 ksi·√in · Hardness, Vickers 160 HV
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Same in both: Density 7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,400°C2,552 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,450°C2,642 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 14.2 W/m·K8.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F · Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 15.9 µm/m·K8.8 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 280 J/g120 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 1,050°C1,922 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.2 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 7.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m30.7 µΩ·in
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.08 V · Corrosion Resistance 68 / 100
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Formability (cold)
Same in both: Machinability 35 / 100 · Weldability 65 / 100 · Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100 · Polishability 60 / 100
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 5.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 210 L/kg25.2 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 45%
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
310 Cold Drawn vs 310 Solution Annealed — frequently asked
Is 310 Cold Drawn stronger than 310 Solution Annealed?
Yes. 310 Cold Drawn has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for 310 Solution Annealed — about 77% more. Tensile strength is 760 MPa (110 ksi) vs 655 MPa (95 ksi).
Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, Cold Drawn or Solution Annealed?
Solution Annealed is the default 310 condition in the FabDigit quote flow. The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.
When should I choose 310 Cold Drawn over 310 Solution Annealed?
Pick 310 Cold Drawn when strength drives the design. Pick 310 Solution Annealed when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 310 Cold Drawn and 310 Solution Annealed side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.