FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 303 vs 316F

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 303 and 316F are both stainless steel grades, both machining-friendly ss. 303 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 655 MPa (95 ksi) against 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) for 316F, about 6% more. 303 is harder — 240 HB against 200 HB for 316F — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. On the shop floor, 316F sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than 303 (premium, $$$).

303Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

316FChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

303 vs 316F: properties

303316F

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
166 GPa24.1 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

655 MPa95 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Compressive Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
—

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

270 MPa39.2 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

30 J22.1 ft·lbf
70 J51.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

240 HB
200 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

99 HRB
93 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

250 HV
—

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 193 GPa28 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 450 MPa65.3 ksi · Elongation at Break 30% · Reduction in Area 50% · Shear Strength 420 MPa60.9 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,375°C2,507 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.3 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

17.3 µm/m·K9.6 µin/in·°F
16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

275 J/g118 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

760°C1,400 °F
700°C1,292 °F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.4 % IACS
2.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
62 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

78%
65%

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

—
40 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 72 / 100 · Weldability 25 / 100 · Formability (cold) 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
55 MJ/kg23,646 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

65%
60%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

83 kN·m/kg
78 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.4 MN·m/kg
24.1 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Modulus of Resilience 525 kJ/m³ · Thermal Diffusivity 4.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale303316F

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability303316F
Default conditionCold DrawnCold Drawn
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining. Both take the same 32 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, CrN, DLC, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing and 20 more.

303 vs 316F — frequently asked

Is 303 stronger than 316F?

Yes. 303 has a typical tensile strength of 655 MPa (95 ksi) against 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) for 316F — about 6% more.

Which is cheaper, 303 or 316F?

316F is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while 303 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose 303 over 316F?

Pick 303 when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters. Pick 316F when cost is the deciding factor.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 303 and 316F side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.