FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 254 SMO vs Alloy 20

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 254 SMO and Alloy 20 are both stainless steel grades, both corrosion resistant ss. 254 SMO is the stronger of the two: yield strength 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Alloy 20, about 13% more; tensile strength follows at 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi). 254 SMO is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 40% for Alloy 20, and 254 SMO is harder (190 HB vs 160 HB). Alloy 20 runs hotter in service (500°C vs 400°C continuous) and 254 SMO conducts heat better (14 W/m·K vs 12 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Alloy 20 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 254 SMO sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Alloy 20 (specialty, $$$$$).

254 SMOChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Alloy 20Choose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

254 SMO vs Alloy 20: properties

254 SMOAlloy 20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

195 GPa28.3 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Shear Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

162 GPa23.5 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

350 MPa50.8 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
40%

Reduction in Area

65%
60%

Compressive Strength

350 MPa50.8 ksi
—

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

220 MPa·√m200 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

200 J148 ft·lbf
190 J140 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

190 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

90 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

200 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8.08 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,325°C2,417 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,390°C2,534 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14 W/m·K8.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12 W/m·K6.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F
14.8 µm/m·K8.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
500°C932 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2 % IACS
1.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

8.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m33.5 µΩ·in
1.08×10⁻⁶ Ω·m42.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

86 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
40%

Weldability

75 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
72 / 100

Castability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.5 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

88 kN·m/kg
77 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.4 MN·m/kg
23.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

314 kJ/m³
249 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.5 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 20254 SMO

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability254 SMOAlloy 20
Default conditionSolution AnnealedAnnealed
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 32 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, CrN, DLC, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing and 20 more.

254 SMO vs Alloy 20 — frequently asked

Is 254 SMO stronger than Alloy 20?

Yes. 254 SMO has a typical yield strength of 350 MPa (50.8 ksi) against 310 MPa (45 ksi) for Alloy 20 — about 13% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 620 MPa (89.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 254 SMO or Alloy 20?

254 SMO is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Alloy 20 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 254 SMO or Alloy 20?

Alloy 20. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (25/100) for 254 SMO; for welding the order is Alloy 20 first (very good, 80/100) then 254 SMO (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 254 SMO and Alloy 20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.