FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4905-AW vs 1.4905-QT

Stainless Steel · 1.4905 temper comparison

1.4905-AW and 1.4905-QT are two conditions of the same stainless steel grade, 1.4905: AW (as-welded deposit) versus QT (quenched and tempered). The chemistry is identical, so every difference below comes from the condition. 1.4905-AW is the stronger of the two: yield strength 800 MPa (116 ksi) against 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) for 1.4905-QT, about 43% more; tensile strength follows at 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 750 MPa (109 ksi). In exchange, 1.4905-QT is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 10% for 1.4905-AW, and 1.4905-AW is harder (375 HB vs 235 HB). On the shop floor, 1.4905-QT machines more easily (poor vs not recommended) and 1.4905-QT welds better (fair vs poor).

1.4905-AWChoose it when strength drives the design.

1.4905-QTChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

1.4905-AW vs 1.4905-QT: properties

1.4905-AW1.4905-QT

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

216 GPa31.3 Msi
218 GPa31.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,000 MPa145 ksi
750 MPa109 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

800 MPa116 ksi
560 MPa81.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
20%

Reduction in Area

35%
58%

Compressive Strength

820 MPa119 ksi
570 MPa82.7 ksi

Shear Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
345 MPa50 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in
95 MPa·√m86.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

12 J8.9 ft·lbf
55 J40.6 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

375 HB
235 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

40 HRC
22 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

400 HV
246 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 84 GPa12.2 Msi · Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Same in both: Density 7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Melting Point (Solidus) 1,420°C2,588 °F · Liquidus Temperature 1,490°C2,714 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
26 W/m·K15 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F · Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 10.8 µm/m·K6 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 600°C1,112 °F · Min Service Temperature -20°C-4 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.8 % IACS
3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

6.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m24.4 µΩ·in
5.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

28 / 100
30 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.4 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

14 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

17%
36%

Weldability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
22 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 30 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.9 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 70 L/kg8.4 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 40%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.4905

1.4905-AW vs 1.4905-QT — frequently asked

Is 1.4905-AW stronger than 1.4905-QT?

Yes. 1.4905-AW has a typical yield strength of 800 MPa (116 ksi) against 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) for 1.4905-QT — about 43% more. Tensile strength is 1,000 MPa (145 ksi) vs 750 MPa (109 ksi).

Which condition does FabDigit quote by default, AW or QT?

NT is the default 1.4905 condition in the FabDigit quote flow (neither AW nor QT). The other condition is available on request or by drawing note — specify it in the material field or the part notes and the quote is priced for it.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4905-AW or 1.4905-QT?

1.4905-QT. Its machinability rates poor (32/100) against not recommended (14/100) for 1.4905-AW; for welding the order is 1.4905-QT first (fair, 40/100) then 1.4905-AW (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4905-AW and 1.4905-QT side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.