FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4864 vs Alloy 20

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4864 and Alloy 20 are both stainless steel grades. Alloy 20 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 255 MPa (37 ksi) for 1.4864, about 22% more; tensile strength follows at 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi). Alloy 20 is harder — 160 HB against 150 HB for 1.4864 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 1.4864 runs hotter in service (1,050°C vs 500°C continuous). On the shop floor, Alloy 20 machines more easily (fair vs poor), Alloy 20 welds better (80 vs 70 out of 100), and Alloy 20 forms better (very good vs good).

1.4864Choose it when the part sees heat, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Alloy 20Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

1.4864 vs Alloy 20: properties

1.4864Alloy 20

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

196 GPa28.4 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

158 GPa22.9 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

585 MPa84.8 ksi
620 MPa89.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

255 MPa37 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Elongation at Break

43%
40%

Reduction in Area

55%
60%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
—

Shear Strength

380 MPa55.1 ksi
415 MPa60.2 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

230 MPa33.4 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

160 MPa·√m146 ksi·√in
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

120 J88.5 ft·lbf
190 J140 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
160 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
85 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

158 HV
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.94 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
8.08 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,360°C2,480 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,425°C2,597 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

12.6 W/m·K7.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12 W/m·K6.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

14.9 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
14.8 µm/m·K8.2 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
285 J/g123 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,050°C1,922 °F
500°C932 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
1.6 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.02×10⁻⁶ Ω·m40.2 µΩ·in
1.08×10⁻⁶ Ω·m42.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.08 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
80 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

28 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
40%

Weldability

70 / 100
80 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
72 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
75 / 100

Castability

—
55 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.5 kg CO₂/kg
7.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

50%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

74 kN·m/kg
77 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.7 MN·m/kg
23.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

166 kJ/m³
249 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleAlloy 201.4864

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4864Alloy 20
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Default condition—Annealed
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
Electropolishing—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Passivation (Stainless Steel)—Yes

They share 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4864 vs Alloy 20 — frequently asked

Is Alloy 20 stronger than 1.4864?

Yes. Alloy 20 has a typical yield strength of 310 MPa (45 ksi) against 255 MPa (37 ksi) for 1.4864 — about 22% more. Tensile strength is 620 MPa (89.9 ksi) vs 585 MPa (84.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4864 or Alloy 20?

1.4864 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Alloy 20 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4864 or Alloy 20?

Alloy 20. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (28/100) for 1.4864; for welding the order is Alloy 20 first (very good, 80/100) then 1.4864 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4864 and Alloy 20 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.