FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4849 vs CK35MN

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4849 and CK35MN are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 250 MPa — strength does not separate them. CK35MN is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 10% for 1.4849. CK35MN is stiffer (193 GPa vs 170 GPa) and CK35MN conducts electricity better (2 % IACS vs 1.7 % IACS). On the shop floor, 1.4849 welds better (good vs fair).

1.4849Choose it when it will be welded.

CK35MNChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.4849 vs CK35MN: properties

1.4849CK35MN

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

170 GPa24.7 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Shear Modulus

66 GPa9.6 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
155 GPa22.5 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

490 MPa71.1 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
30%

Reduction in Area

10%
35%

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
38 J28 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
185 HB

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
85 MPa·√m77.4 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
89 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
195 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.29 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 250 MPa36.3 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,320°C2,408 °F
1,370°C2,498 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,385°C2,525 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

13.5 W/m·K7.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
14.5 W/m·K8.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
15.9 µm/m·K8.8 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-100°C-148 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Max Service Temperature (continuous) 1,050°C1,922 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in
8.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m33.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
30%

Weldability

55 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

72 / 100
70 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb
60 MJ/kg25,795 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.2 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
65%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
65 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

21.5 MN·m/kg
24.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

184 kJ/m³
162 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
3.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
2

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.4849CK35MN

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4849CK35MN
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4849 vs CK35MN — frequently asked

What is the difference between 1.4849 and CK35MN?

Stainless Steel 1.4849 and CK35MN are both stainless steel grades. Both yield at about 250 MPa — strength does not separate them. CK35MN is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 10% for 1.4849.

Which is cheaper, 1.4849 or CK35MN?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4849 or CK35MN?

CK35MN, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 28/100 against 20/100 for 1.4849; for welding the order is 1.4849 first (good, 55/100) then CK35MN (fair, 40/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4849 and CK35MN side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.