FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4849 vs CF3A

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4849 and CF3A are both stainless steel grades. CF3A is the stronger of the two: yield strength 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 1.4849, about 14% more; tensile strength follows at 565 MPa (81.9 ksi) vs 490 MPa (71.1 ksi). CF3A is the more ductile: elongation 48% versus 10% for 1.4849, and 1.4849 is harder (180 HB vs 155 HB). CF3A is stiffer (193 GPa vs 170 GPa) and 1.4849 runs hotter in service (1,050°C vs 425°C continuous). On the shop floor, CF3A machines more easily (fair vs poor), CF3A welds better (excellent vs good), and CF3A sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 1.4849 (high, $$$$).

1.4849Choose it when the part sees heat.

CF3AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.4849 vs CF3A: properties

1.4849CF3A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

170 GPa24.7 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Shear Modulus

66 GPa9.6 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

490 MPa71.1 ksi
565 MPa81.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
48%

Reduction in Area

10%
58%

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
240 MPa34.8 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
120 J88.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
155 HB

Compressive Strength

—
285 MPa41.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
180 MPa·√m164 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
82 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 140 GPa20.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.29

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,320°C2,408 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,385°C2,525 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

13.5 W/m·K7.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
16.5 µm/m·K9.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,050°C1,922 °F
425°C797 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in
7.1×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
65 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
38 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
40%

Weldability

55 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

72 / 100
78 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
62 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb
53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.2 kg CO₂/kg
3.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
75%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
73 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

21.5 MN·m/kg
24.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

184 kJ/m³
210 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
4.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.4849CF3A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4849CF3A
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4849 vs CF3A — frequently asked

Is CF3A stronger than 1.4849?

Yes. CF3A has a typical yield strength of 285 MPa (41.3 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 1.4849 — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 565 MPa (81.9 ksi) vs 490 MPa (71.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4849 or CF3A?

CF3A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 1.4849 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4849 or CF3A?

CF3A. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (20/100) for 1.4849; for welding the order is CF3A first (excellent, 88/100) then 1.4849 (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4849 and CF3A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.