FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4849 vs CE30

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4849 and CE30 are both stainless steel grades. CE30 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 434 MPa (62.9 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 1.4849, about 74% more; tensile strength follows at 669 MPa (97 ksi) vs 490 MPa (71.1 ksi). CE30 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 10% for 1.4849, and CE30 is harder (190 HB vs 180 HB). CE30 is stiffer (193 GPa vs 170 GPa) and 1.4849 runs hotter in service (1,050°C vs 650°C continuous). On the shop floor, CE30 machines more easily (33 vs 20 out of 100) and CE30 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 1.4849 (high, $$$$).

1.4849Choose it when the part sees heat.

CE30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.4849 vs CE30: properties

1.4849CE30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

170 GPa24.7 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Shear Modulus

66 GPa9.6 Msi
75 GPa10.9 Msi

Bulk Modulus

140 GPa20.3 Msi
160 GPa23.2 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

490 MPa71.1 ksi
669 MPa97 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
434 MPa62.9 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
18%

Reduction in Area

10%
22%

Shear Strength

300 MPa43.5 ksi
420 MPa60.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

190 MPa27.6 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

20 J14.8 ft·lbf
16 J11.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
190 HB

Compressive Strength

—
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
60 MPa·√m54.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
90 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
12 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

—
200 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.9 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.72 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,320°C2,408 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,385°C2,525 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

13.5 W/m·K7.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

15 µm/m·K8.3 µin/in·°F
15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,050°C1,922 °F
650°C1,202 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-45°C-49 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.7 % IACS
2.2 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁻⁶ Ω·m39.4 µΩ·in
7.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m30.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
72 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
33 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
35%

Weldability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
15 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Castability 72 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb
53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.2 kg CO₂/kg
5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
75%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
87 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

21.5 MN·m/kg
25 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

184 kJ/m³
488 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.4 mm²/s
4.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
4

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.4849CE30

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4849CE30
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4849 vs CE30 — frequently asked

Is CE30 stronger than 1.4849?

Yes. CE30 has a typical yield strength of 434 MPa (62.9 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for 1.4849 — about 74% more. Tensile strength is 669 MPa (97 ksi) vs 490 MPa (71.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4849 or CE30?

CE30 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 1.4849 is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 1.4849 or CE30?

CE30, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 33/100 against 20/100 for 1.4849; for welding the order is 1.4849 first (good, 55/100) then CE30 (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4849 and CE30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.