FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 1.4837 vs ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 1.4837 and ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2 are both stainless steel grades. 1.4837 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2, about 6% more; tensile strength follows at 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi). 1.4837 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 10% for ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2.

1.4837Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

1.4837 vs ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2: properties

1.4837ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

150 GPa21.8 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.29
0.28

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

520 MPa75.4 ksi
480 MPa69.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

265 MPa38.4 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
10%

Reduction in Area

15%
12%

Compressive Strength

270 MPa39.2 ksi
—

Shear Strength

340 MPa49.3 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

200 MPa29 ksi
190 MPa27.6 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

15 J11.1 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
50 MPa·√m45.5 ksi·√in

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 185 GPa26.8 Msi · Shear Modulus 72 GPa10.4 Msi · Hardness, Brinell 190 HB · Hardness, Rockwell B 92 HRB · Hardness, Vickers 200 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.7 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.75 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,370°C2,498 °F
1,350°C2,462 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

14.5 W/m·K8.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
13.5 W/m·K7.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
15.5 µm/m·K8.6 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,050°C1,922 °F
1,100°C2,012 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -50°C-58 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 1.9 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m35.4 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.1 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 62 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

12 / 100
5 / 100

Castability

72 / 100
78 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

—
45 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 25% · Weldability 40 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.3 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
190 L/kg22.8 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

70%
60%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 58 MJ/kg24,936 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

68 kN·m/kg
62 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24 MN·m/kg
23.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

190 kJ/m³
169 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.8 mm²/s
3.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
2

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale1.4837ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability1.4837ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 7 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Pickling, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

1.4837 vs ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2 — frequently asked

Is 1.4837 stronger than ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2?

Yes. 1.4837 has a typical yield strength of 265 MPa (38.4 ksi) against 250 MPa (36.3 ksi) for ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 520 MPa (75.4 ksi) vs 480 MPa (69.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 1.4837 or ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 1.4837 over ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2?

Pick 1.4837 when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 1.4837 and ZG40Cr25Ni20Si2 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.